Legumes receive increasing attention in sustainability transition research as they can contribute to more sustainable food systems. Previous research has established the need for policies relating to both production and consumption to tackle the marginalisation of legumes in European cropping systems and diets. In this paper, we apply the policy mix framework to food system transition and develop it further into an interpretive policy mix framework to evaluate policy mixes for more vital legume value chains. The interpretive policy mix framework facilitates a better understanding of competing policy frames in designing more consistent, coherent, and comprehensive policy mixes for transitions. The paper analyses three competing policy frames promoted by the food system actors, who are engaged in the development of legume production and consumption in Finland. A comparative analysis of the frames highlights that the policy objectives do not align well; currently, there is no shared understanding among food system actors of what kind of policy mix is needed for more vital legume value chains. The results emphasise networking as a key element in building more coherent policy mixes. The paper shows how the interpretive policy mix framework can support in this endeavour by unveiling conflict lines and possible compromises between the different policy frames.
How to Cite
policy mix, policy frame, sustainability transition, food system, legumes
Balázs, B., Kelemen, E., Centofanti, T., Vasconcelos, M.W. and Iannetta, P.P.M. (2021b) ‘Integrated policy analysis to identify transformation paths to more sustainable legume-based food and feed value-chains in Europe’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 45, pp. 931–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2021.1884165.
Bentia, D.C. (2021) ‘Towards reconfiguration in European agriculture. Analysing dynamics of change through the lens of the Donau Soja organisation’, Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12347.
Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R., Vedung, E. (2003) Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, Routledge, New York.
Candell, J. and Pereira, L. (2017) ‘Towards integrated food policy: main challenges and steps ahead’, Environmental Science and Policy, 73, pp. 89-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.010
CNAUP, Faculdade de Ciencieas da Nutricao e Alimentacao de Universidade do Porto (2003) A nova roda dos alimentos. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/ax433o/ax433o.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
Diercks, G. (2019) ‘Lost in translation: How legacy limits the OECD in promoting new policy mixes for sustainability transitions’, Research Policy 48, 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.002.
EC, European Commission (2018) Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Development of Plant Proteins in the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0757&from=EN (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
EC (2020) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee of the regions. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmental-friendly food system, COM/2020/381 final.
Edenred (2021) Lounasseteli™ lunch vouchers aka Lounari. Available at: https://edenred.fi/en/employer/lunch-benefit/lunch-voucher-aka-lounari/ (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
Edmondson, D., Kern, F. and Rogge, K. (2019) ‘The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transition’, Research Policy 48, 103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010.
Entman, R.M. (1993) ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
Ericksen, P.J. (2008) ‘Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research’, Global Environmental Change, 18(1), pp. 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002.
Ferreira, H., Vasconcelos M., Gil, A.M. and Pinto, E. (2020) ‘Benefits of pulse consumption on metabolism and health: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials’, Critical Reviews Food Science and Nutrition, 61, pp. 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1716680.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E. and Laranja, M. (2011) ‘Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation’, Research Policy, 40, pp. 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005.
Fogelholm, M., Närvänen, E., Erkkola, M., et al. (2021) Marketing of unhealthy foods to children and youth Situation in Finland and rules for regulation. Available at: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/163546 (Accessed: 7 January 2022). [in Finnish]
Food Authority (2021) 2. Viherryttämistuki 2021. Available at: https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/viljelijat/oppaat/hakuoppaat/viljelijatukien-hakuopas-2021/viljelijatukien-hakuopas/paatukihaun-tuet/viherryttamistuki/2.-viherryttamistuki-2021/ (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
Geels, F.W. (2014) ‘Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective’, Theory, Culture & Society, 31, pp. 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627.
Health Council of the Netherlands (2015) Dutch dietary guidelines 2015. Available at: https://www.healthcouncil.nl/documents/advisory-reports/2015/11/04/dutch-dietary-guidelines-2015 (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
Hajer, M.A. and Wagenaar, H. (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Helsediktoratet (2021) Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022. Available at: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/english/nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2022 (Accessed: 7 January 2022)
Howlett, M. and Rayner, J. (2007) ‘Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in “new governance arrangements”’, Policy and Society 26, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2.
Huan-Niemi, E., Kaljonen, M., Knuuttila, M., Niemi, J. and Saarinen, M. (2020) ‘The impacts of dietary change in Finland: Food systems approach’, Agriculture and Food Science, 29, pp. 372–382. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.95282.
Huttunen, S., Kivimaa, P. and Virkamäki, V. (2014) ‘The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12, pp. 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.002.
Kaljonen, M., Peltola, T., Kettunen, M. Salo, M. and Furman, E. (2018) ‘Vegs to school – experimental research for sustainability transition’, Alue & Ympäristö, 2(2018), pp. 32–47. https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.75114. [in Finnish]
Kaljonen, M., Salo, M., Lyytimäki, J. and Furman E., (2020) ’From isolated labels and nudges to sustained tinkering: assessing long-term changes in sustainable eating at a lunch restaurant’, British Food Journal, 122, pp. 3313–3329. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2019-0816.
Kaljonen, M., Kortetmäki, T., Tribaldos, T. et al. (2021) ’Justice in transitions: widening considerations of justice in dietary transition’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 40, pp. 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.007.
Kemp, R., Schot, J.W. and Hoogma, R. (1998) ‘Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, pp. 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310.
Kern, F., Rogge, K.S. and Howlett, M. (2019) ‘Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies’, Research Policy, 48, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832.
Kivimaa, P. and Kern, F. (2016) ‘Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions’, Research Policy, 45, pp. 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008.
Kivimaa, K., Kangas, H.-L. and Lazarevic, D. (2017) ‘Client-oriented evaluation of ‘creative destruction’ in policy mixes: Finnish policies on building energy efficiency transition’, Energy Research and Social Sciences, 33, pp. 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.002.
Kivimaa P. and Rogge, K.S. (2020) ‘Interplay of Policy Experimentation and Institutional Change in Transformative Policy Mixes: The Case of Mobility as a Service in Finland’, SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-17, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
Kivimaa, P., Lonkila, A., Laakso, S. and Kaljonen, M. (2021) ‘Moving beyond disruptive innovations: a review of disruption in sustainability transitions’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 38, pp. 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.12.001.
Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A., Rahikainen, M., Lonkila, A. and Yang, B. (2021) ’Alternative Proteins and EU Food Law’, Food Control, 108336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108336.
Lang, T. (2021) ‘The Sustainable Diet Question: Reasserting societal dynamics into the debate about a Good Diet’, International journal of sociology of agriculture and food, 27, pp. 12–34. https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v27i1.88.
Lehtonen, H., Saarnio, S., Rantala, J., et al. (2020) The climate road map for agriculture. Road map for green house gas emissions, The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners MTK ry, Helsinki. https://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/546180 (Accessed 18 August 2021). [in Finnish]
Lonkila, A. and Kaljonen, M. (2021) ‘Promises of meat and milk alternatives - integrative literature review on emergent research themes’, Agriculture and Human Values (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10184-9.
Lonkila, A. and Kaljonen, M. (2022) ‘Ontological struggle over new product category: transition potential of Finnish meat alternatives’, Environment Innovation and Societal Transitions 42, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.11.002.
Luke (2021) Yield of the main crops by Year, ELY Centre, Variable, Production method and Crop. Available at: http://statdb.luke.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/LUKE/LUKE__02%20Maatalous__04%20Tuotanto__14%20Satotilasto/01_Viljelykasvien_sato.px/table/tableViewLayout1/?rxid=dc711a9e-de6d-454b-82c2-74ff79a3a5e0 (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
Magrini, M., Anton, M., Cholez, C., et al. (2016) ‘Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agri-food system’, Ecological Economics, 126, pp. 152–162. htpps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.024.
Magrini, M.-B., Fernandez-Inigo, H., Doré, A. and Pauly, O. (2021) ‘How institutional food services can contribute to sustainable agrifood systems? Investigating legume-serving, legume-cooking and legume-sourcing through France in 2019’, Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies 102, pp. 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-021-00146-y.
Makery (2019) Katsaus kasviproteiinituotteiden markkinoihin Euroopassa [An overview of the market for plant-based protein products in Europe]. Available at: https://www.luke.fi/scenoprot/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/11/Makery-2019-Katsaus-kasviproteiinituotteiden-markkinoihin-Euroopassa.pdfhttps://www.luke.fi/scenoprot/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/11/Makery-2019-Katsaus-kasviproteiinituotteiden-markkinoihin-Euroopassa.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2022). [in Finnish]
Mason, P.J. and Lang, T. (2017) Sustainable diets: How ecological nutrition can transform consumption and the food system, Taylor & Francis Group, London, New York.
Meadowcroft, J. (2009) ‘What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions’, Policy Sci., 42, pp. 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z.
MAF, Ministry for Forestry and Agriculture (Finland) (2014) Rural Development Programme for Mainland Finland 2014–2020. Available at: https://www.maaseutu.fi/uploads/rural_development_programme_2014-2020.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
MAF (2020) Climate-friendly Food Programme. Available at: https://mmm.fi/en/climatefriendlyfoodprogramme (Accessed 7 January 2022).
MAF (2021a) Coupled support ensures the supply of domestic raw materials to the food industry. https://mmm.fi/en/coupled-support (Accessed:7 January 2022).
MAF (2021b) CAP-plan 2023-2027 for Finland. Available at: https://mmm.fi/documents/1410837/12210688/Suomen+CAP-suunnitelma_nettiin.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
MMS, Ministère Solidarités et de la Santé (France) (2019) Programme National Nutrition Santé 2019-2023. Available at: https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/pnns4_2019-2023.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
MoE, Ministry of Environment (2021) Medium-term climate change policy plan. Towards carbon-neutral society 2035, Draft for comments 8.12.2021. Available at: https://ym.fi/en/medium-term-climate-change-policy-plan (Accessed 7 January 2022).
Mundell, R. (1962) ‘The appropriate use of monetary and fiscal policy for internal and external stability’, IMF Staff Papers, pp. 70–77.
Mylan, J., Morris, C., Beech, E. and Geels, F.W. (2019) ‘Rage against the regime: Niche-regime interactions in the societal embedding of plant-based milk’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31, pp. 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.001.
Narciso, A. and Fonte, M. (2021) ‘Making Farm-to-Fork Front-of-the-Pack: Labelling a Sustainable European Diet’, International journal of sociology of agriculture and food, 27, pp. 54–70. https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v27i1.450.
Nemecek, T., von Richthofen, J-S., Dubois, G., et al. (2008) ‘Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations’, European Journal of Agronomy 28, pp. 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00443.x.
NNC, National Nutrition Council (Finland) (2014) Suomalaiset ravitsemussuositukset 2014. Available at: https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/globalassets/teemat/terveytta-edistava-ruokavalio/kuluttaja-ja-ammattilaismateriaali/julkaisut/ravitsemussuositukset_2014_fi_web_versio_5.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
NNC (2017) Eating and learning together - recommendations for school meals. Available at: http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/134867 (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
Peoples, M.B., Brockwell, J., Herridge, D.F., et al. (2009) ‘The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems’, Symbiosis, 48, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179980.
Päivärinta, E., Itkonen, S.T., Pellinen, T., et al. (2020) ‘Replacing Animal-Based Proteins with Plant-Based Proteins Changes the Composition of a Whole Nordic Diet—A Randomised Clinical Trial in Healthy Finnish Adults’. Nutrients, 12, 943. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12040943.
Reichardt, K. Negro, S.O., Rogge, K.S., and Hekkert, M.P. (2016) ‘Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: The case of offshore wind in Germany’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106, pp. 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029.
Rogge, K.S. and Reichardt, K. (2016) ‘Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis’, Research Policy, 45(8), pp. 120–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004.
Rogge, K.S., Pfluger, B. and Geels, F.W. (2020) ‘Transformative policy mixes in socio-technical scenarios: The case of the low-carbon transition of the German electricity system (2010–2050)’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.002.
Rosenbloom, D., Berton, J. and Meadowcroft, J. (2016) ‘Framing the sun: a discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario’, Canada. Research Policy, 45, pp. 1275–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.012.
Schiavo, M. and Aubert, P.-M. (2020) ‘For a successful protein transition: what measures are needed?’, IDDRI, Policy Brief N°04/20.
Schön, D.A. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies, Basic Books, New York.
Smith, A. and Raven, R. (2012) ‘What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability’, Research Policy, 41, pp. 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Yale University Press, Yale.
Topp, K., Watson, C., Pava, V., et al. (2014) Policy implications of the environmental and resource effects of legume cropping, Legume Futures Report, 3.8/6.6.
Tziva, M., Negro, S.O., Kalfagianni, A. and Hekkert, M.P. (2020) ‘Understanding the protein transition: The rise of plant-based meat substitutes’, Environmental Innovavtion and Societal Transition, 35, pp. 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.09.004.
van der Vooren, A. and Brouillat, E. (2015) ‘Environmental innovation and societal transitions evaluating CO2 reduction policy mixes in the automotive sector’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transition, 14, pp. 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.10.001.
Voisin, A.S., Guéguen, J., Huyghe, C., et al. (2014) ‘Legumes for feed, food, biomaterials and bioenergy in Europe: a review’, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, pp. 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0189-y.
von Richthofen, J.-S., Pahl, H., Bouttet, D., et al. (2006) ‘What do European farmers think about grain legumes’, Grain Legumes, 45, pp. 14–15.
VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd. (2020a) Protein cluster to accelerate growth of domestic plant-based protein sector. Available at: https://www.vttresearch.com/en/news-and-ideas/protein-cluster-accelerate-growth-domestic-plant-based-protein-sector (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
VTT (2020b) Food & Beyond innovation ecosystem solves future challenges of the food industry. Available at: https://www.vttresearch.com/en/news-and-ideas/food-beyond-innovation-ecosystem-solves-future-challenges-food-industry (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, et al. (2019) ‘Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems’, The Lancet, 393(10170), pp. 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.
Zander, P., Amjath-Babu, T.S., Preissel, S., et al. (2016) ‘Grain Legume Decline and Potential Recovery in European Agriculture: A Review’, Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0365-y.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Academy of Finland
Grant numbers Academy of Finland [grant number 315897];Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland [grant number 327369, 327284]